Agency workspaceNederlands
Free agency tool · first-pass checkNo account for the first check

Can you show the evidence behind every candidate claim?

Compare one vacancy with one candidate CV. The checker extracts the important requirements, locates supporting source text and leaves weak or missing evidence visible before you prepare a client submission.

  • ✓Fictional sample included
  • ✓Source snippets, not a black-box score
  • ✓Recruiter approval is still required

Run the evidence check

One vacancy. One CV. Clear next questions.

Start with the fictional case to see the complete result. For a real check, use only a CV you are authorised to process.

Do not add a requirement to the CV just because the vacancy contains the keyword.

The checker does not write CV or vacancy content to WerkCV analytics. Use fictional or properly authorised data; the result is a first-pass aid, not a hiring decision.

Privacy, retention and processor information →

Recruiter input

Run the evidence check

The checker does not write CV or vacancy content to WerkCV analytics. Use fictional or properly authorised data; the result is a first-pass aid, not a hiring decision.

01

Evidence is not a keyword

A CV mentioning a tool is not automatically proof of configuring it. Check level, scope, timing and context.

02

Missing stays visible

Availability, rates and current preferences belong in confirmed intake data—not invented from an old CV.

03

A human sends it

The checker suggests where to look. A recruiter still reviews the original source before a client sees the proposal.

How to read the result

A source line is a starting point, not a guarantee.

The tool is intentionally conservative. It separates what the vacancy asks for, what the CV appears to say and what a recruiter still needs to verify. That makes the output useful for review without pretending that a text model can certify a candidate.

StatusWhat the tool foundRecruiter action
Strong · reviewA requirement and a likely CV source line align closely.Verify level, scope and date; then mark it reviewed.
Partial · reviewSome language overlaps, but the source may not cover the full requirement.Open the source and ask the missing question.
Not demonstratedNo reliable CV source line was located.Leave it open or ask the candidate. Do not invent the claim.

Method

Four checks, with the limits shown.

01

Extract

Identify explicit requirements from the vacancy text. The tool does not decide which requirements are legally or commercially decisive.

02

Locate

Find the closest vacancy and CV source lines. The displayed snippet always comes from the supplied text, not from a generated quote.

03

Classify

Separate strong-looking, partial and missing evidence. A partial match remains a question, not a positive claim.

04

Review

The recruiter checks the original CV, current candidate information and the purpose of sharing before any client output.

Do not use it for

Automated hiring decisions

  • —Ranking or rejecting candidates without human review
  • —Inferring protected characteristics or personal traits
  • —Turning a keyword into a claim of competence
  • —Replacing candidate consent, intake or reference checks

Use it for

A consistent pre-send review

  • ✓Finding which requirements still need a candidate question
  • ✓Giving a reviewer a source line to verify
  • ✓Keeping evidence and open points separate
  • ✓Deciding whether a full MatchPack review is worthwhile

Trust and data

A useful result must also be safe to use.

Use fictional or authorised candidate data. Explain how an AI-assisted tool is used, keep a human in the loop and document the limits of the output. For real MatchPack processing, ask for the current DPA and subprocessor information before deployment.

Read WerkCV privacy and processor information →

External guidance

UK Government: Responsible AI in RecruitmentICO: data protection considerations for AI-assisted recruitmentNVP Application Code 2025

FAQ

Questions agencies should answer before sharing a candidate.

What does the Candidate Proposal Evidence Checker check?

It extracts a first set of concrete requirements from the vacancy, locates possible source lines in the CV and shows a provisional status for each requirement. A recruiter must verify every source line against the original CV.

Is a strong source match proof that the candidate is suitable?

No. A source match only shows that CV text overlaps with a requirement. The recruiter still needs to check level, scope, date, context and truth. The checker does not make a hiring or rejection decision.

Why does availability stay blank when it is not in the CV?

Availability, hours, notice period, rate and current preferences should come from confirmed intake information. An old CV is not a reliable source for current facts, so missing information remains an open point.

Can I upload a real candidate CV?

Only when your agency is authorised to use it for this processing. Use the fictional HR case for a first test. Inform candidates, document your legal basis and processor arrangements, and follow your own retention policy.

How is this different from an ATS or a CV formatting tool?

An ATS manages candidates and vacancies. A formatting tool creates a document. This checker is a first evidence review for one candidate and one vacancy. MatchPack adds the controlled client introduction, reviewer status, version history and export workflow.

Can I send the result directly to a client?

No. The result is an internal first check. Verify the original source, correct the analysis and confirm current candidate information before preparing a client submission. Use the recruiter review in MatchPack for that workflow.

From free check to agency workflow

Want one controlled source for the introduction, CV and email?

Review the complete fictional MatchPack example to see what stays internal, what the client receives and what the recruiter must correct before approval.

View the exampleSee MatchPack